SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD mindcore

Biomimetic emotional mind engine for AI Agents. Provides human-like emotional responses through a 5-layer neural conduction pipeline (L0 Stochastic Noise → L1 Sensor Perception → L2 Subconscious Impulses → L3 Personality Gate → L4 Decision Output) plus 5 psychodynamic patches. Fully decoupled from any LLM — runs locally on CPU with pure Python. Simulates 150 daily impulses across 9 categories with circadian rhythms, mood modulation, and short-term memory influence.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 29 files body ≈ 696 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Biomimetic emotional mind engine for AI Agents.

As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
44/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 29. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 85Steps. 11 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 696 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 469: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 6)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.