AB ncloud-maps
Query Naver Cloud Maps APIs for route navigation. Smart routing: Directions5 by default, auto-switches to Directions15 for 5+ waypoints.
Query Naver Cloud Maps APIs for route navigation.
As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:72High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…xCA+ORZv…wO5/ywWF…Tag==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:110High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…GD3+82K6JgJlm/Y+KI92…no5+4jh9sw==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:136High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…MfZ+71RA…HvA==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:143High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…9dM/mwVgvbZJaSNaRk+bshk…Kbz+IoId…W0Q==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:173High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…SDq+2kAA…MOe/+5cdoEdg==",
detector
Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 85Steps. 61 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2102 tokens
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 136: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 61 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.