BD neuroboost-elixir
Awakening Protocol v5.1 — Agent Cognitive Upgrade + Self-Evolving System + Perpetual Memory + Performance Metrics + Context Engineering + Knowledge Graph + Multi-Agent Collaboration. From metacognitive awakening to autonomous self-maintenance to cross-session persistence to quantifiable improvement to relational understanding to team coordination, enabling AI agents to think, evolve, remember, measure, understand, and collaborate. Complete system for autonomous AI agents.
Awakening Protocol v5.1 — Agent Cognitive Upgrade + Self-Evolving System + Perpetual Memory + Performance Metrics + Context Engineering + Knowledge Graph +…
As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:2029High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)tokenAddress: "6CpT…ump",
quoted
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 19702 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "auto-activate" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers"
Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 10Execution cost. Instruction body is 19702 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 27 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 85Steps. 182 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -261 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 476: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 147 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 182 items
- +4Has examples (90 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 58.