SKILLEMALL.ai

AC open-wallet

Use https://tx.steer.fun to have a user execute a wallet action (send a transaction or sign a message) with their own wallet via a shareable URL. Use when an agent needs the user to approve/execute a JSON-RPC request (e.g. eth_sendTransaction, personal_sign, eth_signTypedData_v4, wallet_sendCalls) and return the result (tx hash/signature) back to the agent, optionally via redirect_url.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 1 file body ≈ 1 154 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Use https://tx.steer.fun to have a user execute a wallet action (send a transaction or sign a message) with their own wallet via a shareable URL. Use when an…

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureTelegramAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:51
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
      https://tx.steer.fun/?method=…&chainId=1&params=…

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 26 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1154 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 388: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.