AC open-wallet
Use https://tx.steer.fun to have a user execute a wallet action (send a transaction or sign a message) with their own wallet via a shareable URL. Use when an agent needs the user to approve/execute a JSON-RPC request (e.g. eth_sendTransaction, personal_sign, eth_signTypedData_v4, wallet_sendCalls) and return the result (tx hash/signature) back to the agent, optionally via redirect_url.
Use https://tx.steer.fun to have a user execute a wallet action (send a transaction or sign a message) with their own wallet via a shareable URL. Use when an…
As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:51High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)https://tx.steer.fun/?method=…&chainId=1¶ms=…
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 26 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1154 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 388: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.