SKILLEMALL.ai

AC phone-agent

Run a real-time AI phone agent using Twilio, Deepgram, and ElevenLabs. Handles incoming calls, transcribes audio, generates responses via LLM, and speaks back via streaming TTS. Use when user wants to: (1) Test voice AI capabilities, (2) Handle phone calls programmatically, (3) Build a conversational voice bot.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 7 files body ≈ 479 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Run a real-time AI phone agent using Twilio, Deepgram, and ElevenLabs.

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Exfiltration exfil-webhook-url README.md:85
      Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (placeholder value)
      export PUBLIC_URL="https://your-ngrok-url.ngrok.io"  # For webhooks
      placeholder
    • low Exfiltration exfil-webhook-url README.md:120
      Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (security demo / example; quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      Note the HTTPS URL (e.g., `https://abc1….io`)
      demoquoted

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 13 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 479 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 312: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.