SKILLEMALL.ai

AD planetscale-cli-skills

Comprehensive PlanetScale CLI (pscale) command reference and workflows for database management via terminal. Use when user mentions PlanetScale CLI, pscale commands, database branches, deploy requests, schema migrations, or any PlanetScale terminal operations. Routes to specialized sub-skills for auth, branches, deploy requests, databases, backups, and 10+ other pscale commands. Triggers on pscale, PlanetScale CLI, database branch, deploy request, schema migration, PlanetScale automation.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 6 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 1 222 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Comprehensive PlanetScale CLI (pscale) command reference and workflows for database management via terminal.

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureGitHubGitLabInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Dangerous commands medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • medium Dangerous commands cmd-privilege README.md:44
      Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions
      sudo mv pscale /usr/local/bin/

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requirements"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 20 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 9 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1222 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 493: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.