SKILLEMALL.ai

AC polymarket-scanner

Automated Polymarket prediction market scanner and trader via Simmer API. Use when analyzing prediction markets, scanning for trading opportunities, executing virtual ($SIM) or real (USDC) trades, checking positions, or managing a Polymarket portfolio. Triggers on "polymarket", "prediction market", "simmer", "trade", "market scan", "betting odds", "arbitrage opportunities".

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 2 files body ≈ 431 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Automated Polymarket prediction market scanner and trader via Simmer API.

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 431 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 376: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.