BD Prezentit - AI Presentation Generator
GET /api/v1/me/credits Authorization: Bearer {PREZENTITAPIKEY} { "credits": 100, "pricing": { "outlinePerSlide": 5, "designPerSlide": 10, "estimatedCostPerSlide": 15 }, "ai": { "canGenerate": true,...
GET /api/v1/me/credits Authorization: Bearer {PREZENTITAPIKEY} { "credits": 100, "pricing": { "outlinePerSlide": 5, "designPerSlide": 10…
As a process D 36/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5468 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 36/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Prezentit - AI Presentation Generator) differs from the folder (prezentit)
- 43Steps. 2 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5468 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4Structure: 0 headings, hard to scan
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -5Long text without headings
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 200: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Has examples (28 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 50.