SKILLEMALL.ai

BC Ralph Loops Skill

Autonomous AI agent loops for iterative development. Based on Geoffrey Huntley's Ralph Wiggum technique, as documented by Clayton Farr.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 19 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 5 143 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Autonomous AI agent loops for iterative development.

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
80/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
58
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 5

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 5
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token dashboard/package-lock.json:34
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…FFX/+gVeY…NlM++NqRc…bqg==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token dashboard/package-lock.json:212
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…FrF+LTRo…W3g==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token dashboard/package-lock.json:221
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…A6j+hAmM…GbS+kf5c…csw==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token dashboard/package-lock.json:230
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…5bm+c2gQ…aG5+esrLODihIorn+Pe6F…dXA==",
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token dashboard/package-lock.json:409
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    "integrity": "sha5…I9y+CyS8…UMQ==",
    detector

Files scanned: 19. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5143 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Ralph Loops Skill) differs from the folder (ralph-loops)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, git, python, node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5143 tokens
  • 85Steps. 104 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 20 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 135: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 49 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 104 items
  • +4Has examples (29 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 58.