BC search-intelligence-skill
Advanced AI-powered search skill using SearXNG as the universal search backend. Multi-engine dork generation, 90+ search engines, intelligent search strategies, intent parsing, result analysis, and adaptive query refinement. No API keys required.
Advanced AI-powered search skill using SearXNG as the universal search backend.
As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.
The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
medium Secrets in code
secret-private-keysearch_dorks_skill/config.py:416Private key material (key header without key body; quoted — discussed, not commanded)'site:{domain} "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- …header onlyquoted -
medium Secrets in code
secret-private-keysearch_dorks_skill/config.py:417Private key material (key header without key body; quoted — discussed, not commanded)'site:{domain} "-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY----- …header onlyquoted -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:765Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)IntentCategory.SECURITY # Vulnerabilities, exposed files, pentesting
Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 9953 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 9953 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 25 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 246: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
- +4Has examples (63 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 60.