SKILLEMALL.ai

AC semantic-walk

A collaborative navigation ritual through semantic space. Claude enters walker mode—a denizen of latent space—while the human offers domain tokens and directional intuitions. Together they walk toward a destination where something currently inaccessible becomes visible. Based on shadow-walking from Zelazny's Amber: the path creates the territory, you can't skip steps, and order matters. The walk is real when tokens are excavated deeply enough to actually shift the space.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 1 file body ≈ 3 397 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 3 d ago

A collaborative navigation ritual through semantic space.

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 74 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3397 tokens
    • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 475: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 32 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 74 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.