BC shadowstrike-security
Elite penetration testing platform with 600+ security tools
Elite penetration testing platform with 600+ security tools
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 15
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 15
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityREADME.md:3Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)**Elite Penetration Testing & Security Assessment Platform**
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityREADME.md:49Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)"pentest target.com" → Full penetration test
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityREADME.md:68Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)**Full Pentest:**
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityREADME.md:70Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)You: "pentest target.com"
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityREADME.md:92Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition; documentation table row)| `pentest [target]` | Full penetration test |
detectortable -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:3Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)description: Elite penetration testing platform with 600+ security tools
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:16Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)**Elite Penetration Testing & Security Assessment Platform**
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:49Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **Privilege Escalation:** linpeas, winpeas
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:50Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **Lateral Movement:** Pivoting and tunneling
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:83Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)"pentest target.com" → Full penetration test
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityUSER-GUIDE.md:3Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)## ⚔️ Welcome to Elite Penetration Testing
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityUSER-GUIDE.md:244Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition; documentation table row)| `pentest [target]` | Full penetration test | 10-30 min |
detectortable -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityUSER-GUIDE.md:245Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)| `bugbounty [target]` | Bug bounty assessment | 15-45 min |
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityUSER-GUIDE.md:248Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)| `redteam [target]` | Red team simulation | 1-3 hours |
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityUSER-GUIDE.md:252Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)"pentest target.com"
detector
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (shadowstrike-security) differs from the folder (shadow-strike-security)
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 42 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2171 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 59: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -218 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 32 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
- +4Has examples (15 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.