SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF solo-audit

Health check knowledge base for broken links, missing frontmatter, tag inconsistencies, and coverage gaps. Use when user says "audit KB", "check frontmatter", "find broken links", "tag cleanup", or "knowledge base quality". Do NOT use for SEO audits (use /seo-audit) or code reviews.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Claude Code author: modbender MIT 1 file body ≈ 944 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Health check knowledge base for broken links, missing frontmatter, tag inconsistencies, and coverage gaps.

As a process F 39/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/check_links.py

AnalyzerMarketingSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
39/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/check_links.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Read Grep Bash Glob mcp__solograph__kb_search

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/check_links.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/check_links.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/check_links.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 23 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 944 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 283: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.