BC sovereign-seo-audit
Comprehensive SEO auditor that analyzes technical SEO, on-page optimization, content quality, and site architecture. Produces a scored report with prioritized fixes. Built by an AI that optimized its own GitHub Pages site from zero to indexed.
Comprehensive SEO auditor that analyzes technical SEO, on-page optimization, content quality, and site architecture.
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, execution cost
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 10743 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 10743 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Steps. 353 steps, 4 vague phrases
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (9 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 243: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 67 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 353 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.