SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC stp

结构化任务规划与分步执行 V2（异步子代理架构）。支持将每个步骤通过 session_spawn 创建子代理异步执行，主会话保持非阻塞。功能包括：步骤分解、子代理执行、子代理检验（LLM判断）、状态跟踪、Heartbeat 监控、任务中断。触发词：/stp、任务规划、步骤执行。

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 5 files body ≈ 2 224 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

结构化任务规划与分步执行 V2（异步子代理架构）。支持将每个步骤通过 sessionspawn 创建子代理异步执行，主会话保持非阻塞。功能包括：步骤分解、子代理执行、子代理检验（LLM判断）、状态跟踪、Heartbeat 监控、任务中断。触发词：/stp、任务规划、步骤执行。

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_en"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 92 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2224 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (10 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 139: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 39 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 92 items
  • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.