BC stranger-danger
Give your AI agent a safe word. Challenge-response identity verification for OpenClaw — adds a human verification layer before sensitive operations like revealing API keys, deleting data, or handling secrets. Answer is bcrypt-hashed and stored in macOS Keychain.
Give your AI agent a safe word.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 5
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 5
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:183High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…FSj+bWLt…2sH/Kn8E…h6w==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:340High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…GLw+xYSd…cqA==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:357High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…Loy/Rxalv2kr+lqMlUnrDWV+3j4p…IHu+HtC7…g8A==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:530High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…CpK+FtMRQVdIMN6/Df5j…tIC+7KYK…qaA==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:660High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…VHO+q2xB…AGd+Kl0mmq/MprG…MzA==",
detector
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "when" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "examples"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 15 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 288 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- -35 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 262: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.