AC summarize-pro
When user asks to summarize text, articles, documents, meetings, emails, YouTube transcripts, books, PDFs, reports, conversations, or any long content. Also handles bullet points, key takeaways, action items, TL;DR, ELI5, executive summaries, chapter summaries, comparison summaries, translation summaries, thread summaries, and custom-length summaries. 20-feature AI summarizer with multiple formats, languages, and export options. All processing happens locally — NO external API calls, NO network requests, NO data sent to any server.
When user asks to summarize text, articles, documents, meetings, emails, YouTube transcripts, books, PDFs, reports, conversations, or any long content.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4178 tokens
- 100Steps. 55 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 29 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 537: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 31 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 55 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (27 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.