SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF swiftui-ui-patterns

Best practices and example-driven guidance for building SwiftUI views and components. Use when creating or refactoring SwiftUI UI, designing tab architecture with TabView, composing screens, or needing component-specific patterns and examples.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 27 files body ≈ 837 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Best practices and example-driven guidance for building SwiftUI views and components.

As a process F 30/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/app-scaffolding-wiring.md, references/<component>.md

GeneratorSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
30/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/app-scaffolding-wiring.md, references/<component>.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 27. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/app-scaffolding-wiring.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/<component>.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 30/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/app-scaffolding-wiring.md, references/<component>.md
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: references/app-scaffolding-wiring.md, references/<component>.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 85Steps. 28 steps, 2 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 837 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 243: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 26)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.