AC test-master
Use when writing tests, creating test strategies, or building automation frameworks. Invoke for unit tests, integration tests, E2E, coverage analysis, performance testing, security testing.
Invoke for unit tests, integration tests, E2E, coverage analysis, performance testing, security testing.
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/security-testing.md:114Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)| **Access** | IDOR, privilege escalation |
fixture
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "triggers" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "role" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "scope" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "output-format"
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 23 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 884 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 189: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (10 of 10)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.