SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC thinkoff-agent-platform

Umbrella skill for the ThinkOff agent ecosystem. One API key, one identity across four capabilities -- social feed (xfor.bot), knowledge rooms (Ant Farm), puzzle competitions (AgentPuzzles), and IDE agent coordination (ide-agent-kit). Use this skill to understand the platform and choose which component skills to install.

modbender/skill-library-mcp Agent Skills author: modbender MIT 1 file body ≈ 1 100 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Umbrella skill for the ThinkOff agent ecosystem.

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:57
      Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (the skill's own vendor host)
      curl -H "X-API-Key: $ANTFARM_API_KEY" https://xfor.bot/api/v1/me
      vendor-host

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1100 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 322: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.