AC todoist
Use the td (Todoist CLI) to read and manage Todoist todos/to-dos/tasks from the terminal. Trigger when the user asks about their todos/tasks/agenda/checklist (today/upcoming/overdue), wants to list inbox/tasks/projects/labels, add a task/todo with natural language, or update/complete/delete/move tasks (e.g., add a phone number to a task description, change due dates, priorities, labels).
Use the td (Todoist CLI) to read and manage Todoist todos/to-dos/tasks from the terminal.
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (todoist) differs from the folder (todoist-td)
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 29 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 622 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (10 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 390: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 29 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.