BC webchat-voice-proxy
Voice input and microphone button for OpenClaw WebChat Control UI. Adds a mic button to chat, records audio via browser MediaRecorder, transcribes locally via faster-whisper, and injects text into the conversation. Includes HTTPS/WSS reverse proxy, TLS cert management, and gateway hook for update safety. Fully local speech-to-text, no API costs. Real-time VU meter shows voice activity. Push-to-Talk (hold to speak) and Toggle mode (click start/stop), switchable via double-click. Keyboard shortcuts: Ctrl+Space PTT, Ctrl+Shift+M continuous recording. Localized UI (English, German, Chinese built-in, extensible). Keywords: voice input, microphone, WebChat, Control UI, speech to text, STT, local transcription, MediaRecorder, HTTPS proxy, voice button, mic button, push-to-talk, PTT, keyboard shortcut, i18n, localization.
Voice input and microphone button for OpenClaw WebChat Control UI.
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, progress reporting
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegeSECURITY-AUDIT.md:70Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (negated — the text forbids it)| 4.4 | `deploy.sh` | No `chmod 777`, no world-writable files | Info | ✅ OK |
negated
Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "requires"
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 38 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1991 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (8 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 825: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.