BC Skill: WordPress Remote News Publisher
This skill enables automated news content creation and publication to WordPress websites hosted on remote servers. It leverages SSH with public key authentication for secure, passwordless connectio...
This skill enables automated news content creation and publication to WordPress websites hosted on remote servers.
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency, running it twice
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Exfiltration
exfil-read-secret-filesSKILL.md:251Reads credential / secret files (documentation of a security skill)ssh-copy-id -i ~/.ssh/id_e…pub -p 22 de…@….0.113.10
security skill
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Skill: WordPress Remote News Publisher) differs from the folder (wordpress-remote-news-publisher)
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 100Steps. 42 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2526 tokens
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 200: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 23 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
- +3All 4 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.