AC x-alive
Bring your AI agent to life on X/Twitter. Complete toolkit for launching, growing, and maintaining an authentic AI presence — organic replies, trend awareness, dedup, and safety. Use when setting up a new agent on X, defining voice/personality, creating content strategy, automating posts, managing engagement, handling safety (scams, impersonation, tokens), or growing a following organically.
Bring your AI agent to life on X/Twitter.
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:23Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)3. **Your X user ID** — fetch it: `curl -s "https://api.x.com/2/users/by/username/YOUR_HANDLE" -H "Authorization: Bearer $X_BEARER_TOKEN"` — save this for dedup checks
quoted
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 143 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3535 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 19 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 394: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 29 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 143 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.