AB disability-disclosure-decision
Decide whether, when, how, and to whom to disclose a disability or health condition at work — weighing the real benefits (accommodations, protection, honesty) against the real risks (bias, gossip), tuned to your specific situation. Use when someone says 'should I tell work about my disability/condition', 'disclose my ADHD/chronic illness at work', 'when do I tell my employer', or 'how much do I share'. Produces a decision framework for the situation, a disclosure script if you choose to, and the minimum-disclosure options. Your choice throughout; it never pushes disclosure.
Decide whether, when, how, and to whom to disclose a disability or health condition at work — weighing the real benefits (accommodations, protection, honesty)…
As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, failures and branches, progress reporting
The same skill appears in 1 more place: pm-claude-skills
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 23 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1468 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 580: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.