SKILLEMALL.ai

AB grief-admin

Get through the brutal logistics after a death — who to notify, what accounts and services to close, in what order, and what genuinely can't wait vs what can wait months — with explicit permission to do it slowly and in pieces. Use when someone says 'my [person] died and I don't know where to start', 'what do I need to do after a death', 'help me handle the admin', or is drowning in the paperwork of loss. Produces a triaged task list (urgent / soon / whenever), notification scripts, and a gentle sequence. Not legal or tax advice — the humane logistics, with pointers to the professional bits.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills Agent Skills author: mohitagw15856 MIT 1 file body ≈ 1 500 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com analyzed 2 d ago

Get through the brutal logistics after a death — who to notify, what accounts and services to close, in what order, and what genuinely can't wait vs what can…

As a process B 76/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: failures and branches, progress reporting

GeneratorData and analyticsFinancePersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
76/100
Nearly there
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: pm-claude-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 114): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 76/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 24 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1500 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 598: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.