SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF okr-builder

Create well-structured OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) for product teams, startups, and individuals. Use when asked to write OKRs, set quarterly goals, define key results, or review existing OKRs. Produces a complete OKR set with objectives, measurable key results, baselines, and a scoring guide.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills Agent Skills author: mohitagw15856 MIT 4 files body ≈ 1 825 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Create well-structured OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) for product teams, startups, and individuals.

As a process F 58/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../professional-brain/SKILL.md

GeneratorOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
58/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../professional-brain/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: okr-builder (mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills)

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../professional-brain/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../professional-brain/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../professional-brain/SKILL.md
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 31 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1825 tokens
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 299: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.