SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF package-health

Check a package's health before you depend on it — npm and PyPI registry APIs via keyless curl: downloads, release recency, maintenance signals, and the dependency-decision read. Use when asked is this npm package maintained, check this PyPI library before we adopt it, compare these two packages, or is this dependency abandoned. Produces the health read with the signals interpreted (not just listed), the numbers with their commands, and the adopt/avoid/vendor recommendation framing.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills Agent Skills author: mohitagw15856 MIT 1 file body ≈ 1 150 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Check a package's health before you depend on it — npm and PyPI registry APIs via keyless curl: downloads, release recency, maintenance signals, and the…

As a process F 52/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../github-repo-vitals/SKILL.md

GeneratorSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
52/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../github-repo-vitals/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: package-health (mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills)

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../github-repo-vitals/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../github-repo-vitals/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../github-repo-vitals/SKILL.md
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 22 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1150 tokens
  • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 487: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.