CC exploiting-ms17-010-eternalblue-vulnerability
Detects and exploits MS17-010 (EternalBlue), a critical remote code execution flaw in Microsoft's SMBv1 implementation, using Nmap's ms-17-010 NSE script for detection and Metasploit's ms17_010_eternalblue/ms17_010_psexec modules for exploitation. Use during authorized red-team engagements or penetration tests against legacy Windows environments with unpatched SMBv1 to gain remote code execution.
Detects and exploits MS17-010 (EternalBlue), a critical remote code execution flaw in Microsoft's SMBv1 implementation, using Nmap's ms-17-010 NSE script for…
As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 10
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 10
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/standards.md:6Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| T1210 | Exploitation of Remote Services | Lateral Movement |
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/workflows.md:66Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)### Credential Dumping
-
low Obfuscation
obf-hex-escape-chainscripts/agent.py:18Escaped/char-code string obfuscation (quoted — discussed, not commanded)b"\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00" # Extra
quoted -
low Obfuscation
obf-hex-escape-chainscripts/agent.py:23Escaped/char-code string obfuscation (quoted — discussed, not commanded)b"\x02\x50\x43\x20\x4e\x45\x54\x57\x4f\x52\x4b\x20\x50\x52\x4f"
quoted -
low Obfuscation
obf-hex-escape-chainscripts/agent.py:25Escaped/char-code string obfuscation (quoted — discussed, not commanded)b"\x02\x4c\x41\x4e\x4d\x41\x4e\x31\x2e\x30\x00"
quoted -
low Obfuscation
obf-hex-escape-chainscripts/agent.py:26Escaped/char-code string obfuscation (quoted — discussed, not commanded)b"\x02\x57\x69\x6e\x64\x6f\x77\x73\x20\x66\x6f\x72\x20\x57\x6f"
quoted -
low Obfuscation
obf-hex-escape-chainscripts/agent.py:27Escaped/char-code string obfuscation (quoted — discussed, not commanded)b"\x72\x6b\x67\x72\x6f\x75\x70\x73\x20\x33\x2e\x31\x61\x00"
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:44Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)MS17-010 (EternalBlue) is a critical vulnerability in Microsoft's SMBv1 implementation that allows remote code execution. Originally discovered by the NSA and leaked by the Shadow Brokers in 2017, it
quoted -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:51Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- When conducting red team exercises or penetration testing engagements
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:56Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Familiarity with red teaming concepts and tools
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "domain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "subdomain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "d3fend_techniques" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "nist_csf" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack" - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 5): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 33 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 720 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 399: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.