CC exploiting-nopac-cve-2021-42278-42287
Exploits the noPac Active Directory privilege-escalation chain (CVE-2021-42278 sAMAccountName spoofing plus CVE-2021-42287 KDC PAC confusion) using Impacket and secretsdump.py to escalate from a standard domain user to Domain Admin. Use when red-teaming or pentesting Active Directory to validate machine-account impersonation and DCSync-based credential dumping.
Exploits the noPac Active Directory privilege-escalation chain (CVE-2021-42278 sAMAccountName spoofing plus CVE-2021-42287 KDC PAC confusion) using Impacket…
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 8
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 8
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/standards.md:7Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| T1068 | Exploitation for Privilege Escalation | Privilege Escalation |
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/standards.md:11Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| T1003.006 | OS Credential Dumping: DCSync | Credential Access |
-
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literalscripts/process.py:127Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example)password = sys.argv[4] if len(sys.argv) > 4 else ""
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:6Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)red-teaming or pentesting Active Directory to validate machine-account impersonation
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:7Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)and DCSync-based credential dumping.
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:45Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)noPac is a critical exploit chain combining two Active Directory vulnerabilities: CVE-…278 (sAMAccountName spoofing) and CVE-…287 (KDC PAC confusion). Together, they allow any authenticate
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:52Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- When conducting red team exercises or penetration testing engagements
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:57Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Familiarity with red teaming concepts and tools
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "domain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "subdomain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "d3fend_techniques" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "nist_csf" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack"
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 44 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1848 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 363: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.