CC exploiting-zerologon-vulnerability-cve-2020-1472
Exploits the Zerologon vulnerability (CVE-2020-1472) in the Netlogon Remote Protocol using Impacket to reset a domain controller's machine account password to empty, then runs DCSync via secretsdump.py to dump domain credentials. Use when red-teaming or validating unpatched Active Directory domain controllers for Zerologon, including restoring the machine account password afterward.
Exploits the Zerologon vulnerability (CVE-2020-1472) in the Netlogon Remote Protocol using Impacket to reset a domain controller's machine account password to…
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 10
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 10
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/standards.md:4Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **T1068** - Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/standards.md:6Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **T1003.006** - OS Credential Dumping: DCSync
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/standards.md:30Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **Ransomware**: Ryuk, Conti operators used Zerologon for domain takeover
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/workflows.md:53Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)│ └── Service account hashes = lateral movement
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/workflows.md:61Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)**RED TEAM WARNING**: Always restore the DC machine account password immediately after exploitation. Failing to do so will cause Active Directory to break, potentially causing a production outage.
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:50Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- When conducting red team exercises or penetration testing engagements
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:59Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Written authorization for red team engagement
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:68Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| T1068 | Exploitation for Privilege Escalation | Privilege Escalation |
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:69Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| T1210 | Exploitation of Remote Services | Lateral Movement |
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:70Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| T1003.006 | OS Credential Dumping: DCSync | Credential Access |
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "domain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "subdomain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "d3fend_techniques" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "nist_csf" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack"
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 85Steps. 26 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1723 tokens
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 385: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.