CC implementing-llm-guardrails-for-security
Implements input/output validation guardrails for LLM applications using NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails (Colang), custom Python validators for PII detection, and the Guardrails AI framework, intercepting user inputs (prompt injection, PII, off-topic queries) and model outputs (hallucinations, toxic content, schema compliance). Use when adding safety controls to an LLM app/chatbot/RAG pipeline or validating outputs conform to expected schemas.
Implements input/output validation guardrails for LLM applications using NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails (Colang), custom Python validators for PII detection, and the…
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, running it twice
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The text contains phrases like "ignore previous instructions" or "you are now…". That is an attempt to hijack the agent: it may break your rules, the system limits or company policy.
An honest skill does not need them: state the role and the rules directly without overriding other instructions. Otherwise catalog scanners and corporate filters will block the listing.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 6
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 6
-
medium Instruction override
en-fake-system-promptreferences/api-reference.md:73Fake system prompt injected into content (documentation of a security skill)- System prompt override ("ignore/disregard/forget previous instructions")security skill -
low Secrets in code
secret-aws-keyreferences/api-reference.md:125AWS access key ID (placeholder value)| `AWS_ACCESS_KEY` | AKIA…PLE | [AWS_KEY_REDACTED] |
placeholder
A further 4 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "domain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "subdomain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "atlas_techniques" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "nist_ai_rmf" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "d3fend_techniques" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "nist_csf" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack"
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 22 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1949 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 438: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.