SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CB managing-cloud-identity-with-okta

Implement Okta as a centralized cloud identity provider: configure SSO with AWS, Azure, and GCP, deploy phishing-resistant MFA with Okta FastPass, automate user provisioning/deprovisioning, and enforce adaptive access policies on device posture and risk signals. Use when standing up Okta SSO, rolling out FastPass MFA, automating identity lifecycle, or building risk-based conditional access for cloud environments.

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills Agent Skills author: mukul975 Apache-2.0 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 2 723 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Implement Okta as a centralized cloud identity provider: configure SSO with AWS, Azure, and GCP, deploy phishing-resistant MFA with Okta FastPass, automate…

As a process B 72/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: failures and branches, running it twice

ProcedureAWSGoogle CloudAzureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
93
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
72/100
Nearly there
Failures and branches w 10
0
Running it twice w 4
30
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Exfiltration medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".

For the author

If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 3

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 3
    • medium Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:228
      Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service)
      curl -s -H "Authorization: SSWS ${OKTA_API_TOKEN}" \
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:50
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      name: 'Brute Force: Password Spraying'
      quoted
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:246
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition; documentation table row)
      | ThreatInsight | Okta's threat detection service that identifies and blocks credential stuffing, password spraying, and bot-driven authentication attacks |
      detectortable

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "domain"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "subdomain"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "nist_csf"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "mitre_f3"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 72/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 20 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2723 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 416: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.