CC performing-container-image-hardening
Harden container images by minimizing attack surface, stripping unnecessary packages, implementing multi-stage builds, configuring non-root users, and applying CIS Docker Benchmark recommendations to produce secure, production-ready images. Use when building production container images, when compliance requires CIS Docker Benchmark adherence, or when shrinking image size to reduce vulnerability exposure from unused packages.
Harden container images by minimizing attack surface, stripping unnecessary packages, implementing multi-stage builds, configuring non-root users, and…
As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: failures and branches, running it twice, progress reporting
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 8
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 8
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shellscripts/agent.py:119Downloads and executes remote code from an unrecognised host (pipe to shell) (string literal in code, not executed)if upper.startswith("RUN") and "curl" in stripped and "| sh" in stripped:code literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shell-known-hostreferences/api-reference.md:16Pipe-to-shell installer from a well-known host (still executes remote code) (documentation of a security skill)curl -sfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/trivy/main/contrib/install.sh | sh -s -- -b /usr/local/bin
security skill -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegereferences/workflows.md:55Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)- [ ] setuid/setgid bits cleared
security skill -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegescripts/agent.py:110Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (string literal in code, not executed)if upper.startswith("RUN") and ("chmod 777" in stripped or "chmod -R 777" in stripped):code literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegescripts/agent.py:112Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (string literal in code, not executed)"check": "Overly permissive chmod 777",
code literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegescripts/agent.py:115Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (detector / deny-list definition; string literal in code, not executed)"description": "chmod 777 grants world-writable permissions; use specific permissions",
detectorcode literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegeSKILL.md:132Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)# Remove setuid/setgid binaries
security skill -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegeSKILL.md:255Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (negated — the text forbids it)[PASS] No setuid/setgid binaries found
negated
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "domain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "subdomain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "nist_csf" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack"
Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 20 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1933 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 428: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.