SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB performing-kubernetes-etcd-security-assessment

Assesses the security posture of the etcd cluster backing Kubernetes: encryption at rest, TLS peer and client transport, access control, backup encryption, and network isolation. Use when auditing or hardening a control plane, reviewing whether Secrets are encrypted at rest, or protecting etcd backups, since etcd stores Secrets, RBAC policy, and ConfigMaps in plaintext by default. Keywords: etcd, EncryptionConfiguration, encryption at rest, peer TLS, snapshot, backup, control plane. Do not use for broad cluster-wide CIS checks - use performing-kubernetes-cis-benchmark-with-kube-bench.

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills Agent Skills author: mukul975 Apache-2.0 8 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 1 631 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Assesses the security posture of the etcd cluster backing Kubernetes: encryption at rest, TLS peer and client transport, access control, backup encryption…

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, progress reporting

AnalyzerKubernetesSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "domain"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "subdomain"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "nist_csf"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 12 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1631 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 591: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
    • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.