CC performing-physical-intrusion-assessment
Conduct authorized physical penetration testing against facilities, server rooms, and restricted areas using tailgating, RFID badge cloning, lock bypassing, rogue network device deployment, and security-guard procedure testing. Use as part of a full-scope red team engagement to evaluate physical security controls and their path to network access, always under signed client authorization.
Conduct authorized physical penetration testing against facilities, server rooms, and restricted areas using tailgating, RFID badge cloning, lock bypassing…
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 7
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 7
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/standards.md:21Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **ISACA Physical Penetration Testing** white paper (2023)
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:3Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)description: Conduct authorized physical penetration testing against facilities, server rooms, and restricted areas using tailgating, RFID badge cloning, lock bypassing, rogue network device deploymen
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:13Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- physical-pentest
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:39Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)Physical intrusion assessment evaluates an organization's physical security controls by attempting to gain unauthorized access to facilities, server rooms, and restricted areas. This includes tailgati
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:151Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)# Provides SSH reverse tunnel back to C2 server
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:218Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- ISACA Physical Penetration Testing White Paper (2023)
A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "domain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "subdomain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "d3fend_techniques" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "nist_csf" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack"
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 56 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1828 tokens
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 390: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 56 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.