BB performing-power-grid-cybersecurity-assessment
Conduct cybersecurity assessments of power grid infrastructure spanning generation, transmission substations, distribution, and EMS control centers, covering NERC CIP compliance verification, IEC 61850 (GOOSE/MMS) substation protocol analysis, and synchrophasor (PMU) network security against threats like Industroyer/CrashOverride. Use for periodic NERC CIP assessments, substation automation or EMS/SCADA security reviews, or regional entity compliance audits; not for non-BES systems or generic OT assessments without power grid specifics.
Conduct cybersecurity assessments of power grid infrastructure spanning generation, transmission substations, distribution, and EMS control centers, covering…
As a process B 73/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: failures and branches, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "domain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "subdomain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "nist_csf" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack"
Process rating: all ten parameters 73/100
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 14 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2786 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 542: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.