SKILLEMALL.ai

BC reverse-engineering-ios-app-with-frida

Reverse engineers iOS applications using Frida dynamic instrumentation to understand internal logic, extract encryption keys, bypass security controls, and discover hidden functionality without source code access. Use when performing authorized iOS penetration testing, analyzing proprietary protocols, understanding obfuscated logic, or extracting runtime secrets from iOS binaries. Activates for requests involving iOS reverse engineering, Frida iOS hooking, Objective-C/Swift method tracing, or iOS binary analysis.

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills Agent Skills author: mukul975 Apache-2.0 8 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 2 115 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Reverse engineers iOS applications using Frida dynamic instrumentation to understand internal logic, extract encryption keys, bypass security controls, and…

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, progress reporting

ProcedureSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:6
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
      authorized iOS penetration testing, analyzing proprietary protocols, understanding

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "domain"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "subdomain"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "nist_csf"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 19 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2115 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 518: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.