BC scanning-kubernetes-manifests-with-kubesec
Scores Kubernetes resource manifests with Kubesec to flag misconfiguration and privilege-escalation risk before deployment, mapping each finding back to the securityContext change that fixes it. Use when gating manifests in CI, reviewing YAML or a rendered chart before it reaches a cluster, or explaining why a manifest scored negatively. Keywords: Kubesec, manifest score, securityContext, readOnlyRootFilesystem, runAsNonRoot, CI gate. Do not use for scanning built images for CVEs - use scanning-docker-images-with-trivy; for admission-time enforcement use implementing-opa-gatekeeper-for-policy-enforcement.
Scores Kubernetes resource manifests with Kubesec to flag misconfiguration and privilege-escalation risk before deployment, mapping each finding back to the…
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityreferences/standards.md:17Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **Baseline**: Prevents known privilege escalation (kubesec validates hostPID, hostNetwork, privileged)
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:42Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)Kubesec is an open-source security risk analysis tool developed by ControlPlane that inspects Kubernetes resource manifests for common exploitable risks such as privilege escalation, writable host mou
detector
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "domain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "subdomain" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "nist_csf" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "mitre_attack"
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 21 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2049 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 612: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 24 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.