AC kimi-webbridge
Kimi Browser Extension（Kimi 浏览器扩展，原 Kimi WebBridge）lets AI control the user's real browser — navigate, click, type, read, screenshot, and interact with any website using the user's actual login sessions. Use this skill whenever the user wants to interact with websites, automate browser tasks, scrape web content, or perform any action requiring a real browser. Also use when the user mentions "browser", "webpage", "open URL", "screenshot", asks to read/interact with any website, or wants a reusable CLI tool or script that automates a specific website. Use even for simple-sounding browser requests — the daemon handles all complexity.
Kimi Browser Extension（Kimi 浏览器扩展，原 Kimi WebBridge）lets AI control the user's real browser — navigate, click, type, read, screenshot, and interact with any…
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4148 tokens
- 85Steps. 34 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
- low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 638: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.