SKILLEMALL.ai

BD skill-creator

Use when creating or updating a reusable skill with task-specific instructions, supporting files and checks.

The skillemall take

Claims to help create and update reusable AI instructions with file support and checks. One folder in the archive, no scripts, 595 tokens of code. Linting passed, no critical issues found, quality score 78, but process score stuck at 36—meaning the instruction is incomplete or logic doesn't execute properly.

No model runs or sandbox tests were performed, so it's unclear whether the skill actually generates working instructions or just copies a template. Broad platform support across Claude, Cursor, and OpenClaw. Install if you need a skeleton for building custom skills; otherwise, insufficient data to judge.

The same skill from clawhub has been run on models: No improvement D see the result → This is a copy: its text may differ, so the grade is not carried over.

nano-muse/nanoMuse Agent Skills author: nano-muse 1 file body ≈ 595 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 29 h ago

Create a skill for the workflow the user asked to reuse.

As a process D 36/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

GeneratorAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
36/100
Unfinished process
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 36/100

    • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 595 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 108: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 4 headings
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.