SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD add-codex

Use Codex (OpenAI's codex app-server) as a full agent provider — planning, tool orchestration, MCP tools, server-side history, session resume — alongside or instead of Claude. ChatGPT subscription or OpenAI API key, vault-only via the selected gateway. Per-group via `ncl groups config update --provider codex`. Distinct from using OpenAI as an MCP tool (where Claude remains the planner).

nanocoai/nanoclaw Agent Skills author: nanocoai MIT 5 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 2 099 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Use Codex (OpenAI's codex app-server) as a full agent provider — planning, tool orchestration, MCP tools, server-side history, session resume — alongside or…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/provider-migration.md

IntegrationDockerAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/provider-migration.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../docs/provider-migration.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 136): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../docs/provider-migration.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../../docs/provider-migration.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 8 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2099 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 389: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 8 items
  • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.