SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB agent-browser

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to inspect, test, or automate browser behavior: navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting page data, reading selected OpenDesign browser-tab context, testing web apps, dogfooding OpenDesign previews, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Prefer local OpenDesign preview URLs unless the user explicitly asks for external browsing.

nexu-io/open-design Agent Skills author: nexu-io Apache-2.0 1 file body ≈ 1 870 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Browser automation CLI for AI agents.

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "od"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 85Steps. 20 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1870 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 434: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.