CF toolkit
Toolkit management: create and evaluate skills and agents, manage routing tables, generate Claude.md.
Toolkit management: create and evaluate skills and agents, manage routing tables, generate Claude.md.
As a process F 30/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/skill-creator/{skill-template,progressive-disclosure,complexity-tiers,error-catalog,enrichment-workflow}.md, references/agent-creator/{agent-design-patterns,agent-frontmatter-template,agent-eval-design}.md, references/agent-comparison/{methodology,grading-rubric,benchmark-tasks,report-template,optimize-phase}.md
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Glob Grep Agent Task Skill
-
low Secrets in code
secret-password-literalreferences/skill-creator/error-catalog.md:424Hard-coded password / key literal (may be an example) (placeholder value)api_key = "sk-1…def"
placeholder
Files scanned: 79. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/skill-creator/{skill-template,progressive-disclosure,complexity-tiers,error-catalog,enrichment-workflow}.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/agent-creator/{agent-design-patterns,agent-frontmatter-template,agent-eval-design}.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/agent-comparison/{methodology,grading-rubric,benchmark-tasks,report-template,optimize-phase}.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/agent-evaluation/{scoring-rubric,report-templates,batch-evaluation}.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/skill-composer/{compatibility-matrix,composition-patterns,skill-patterns,examples}.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/routing-table-updater/{routing-format,extraction-patterns,conflict-resolution,examples}.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/toolkit-evolution/{diagnose-scripts,evolution-history,evolve-preferred-patterns}.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/generate-claudemd/{CLAUDEMD_TEMPLATE,examples-and-errors}.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/weak_model_run.py - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "routing"
Process rating: all ten parameters 30/100
- 0Tools and files. 9 referenced file(s) missing: references/skill-creator/{skill-template,progressive-disclosure,complexity-tiers,error-catalog,enrichment-workflow}.md, references/agent-creator/{agent-design-patterns,agent-frontmatter-template,agent-eval-design}.md, references/agent-comparison/{methodology,grading-rubric,benchmark-tasks,report-template,optimize-phase}.md
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
- 85Steps. 48 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2785 tokens
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 101: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 9)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 56.