CF local-seo
Local SEO and Google Business Profile audit: diagnose why a business isn't ranking in the local pack / map results and produce a fix plan. Covers GBP completeness, NAP (name/address/phone) consistency across the site and citations, local pack and "near me" ranking factors, review velocity and responses, local landing pages, service-area pages, and LocalBusiness JSON-LD. Use whenever the user asks about local rankings, map results, Google Maps ranking, NAP consistency, store/branch pages, or multi-location SEO. Trigger on: "local SEO", "Google Business Profile", "GBP audit", "rank on Google Maps", "local pack", "map pack", "near me ranking", "NAP", "local citations", "my business isn't on the map", "why don't I show up on Google Maps", "store locator SEO", "multi-location SEO", "service area pages", or any location-based ranking question. For full-site (non-local) audits use /seo-analysis; for a single URL use /seo-page.
Local SEO and Google Business Profile audit: diagnose why a business isn't ranking in the local pack / map results and produce a fix plan.
As a process F 26/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: ../../seo/local-seo/WORKFLOW.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../seo/local-seo/WORKFLOW.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 26/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../../seo/local-seo/WORKFLOW.md
- 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 59 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 933: 120–800 characters recommended
- +4Structure: 1 headings, hard to scan
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- -15SKILL.md body under 300 characters: nearly empty
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 14 example trigger phrases
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 54.