SKILLEMALL.ai

CF programmatic-seo

Programmatic SEO planning and audit: building or evaluating large sets of template-generated pages that target long-tail query patterns (e.g. "[service] in [city]", "[product] vs [product]", "[tool] for [use-case]"). Covers data-source and template design, thin/duplicate-content and doorway-page risks, per-page uniqueness and value thresholds, internal linking and hubs, indexation management (publish vs. noindex), and scaling without a manual action. Use whenever the user wants to generate many pages from a template/dataset, build location/comparison/use-case pages at scale, or asks why generated pages aren't indexing. Trigger on: "programmatic SEO", "pSEO", "generate pages at scale", "templated pages", "location pages at scale", "comparison pages", "[city] pages", "my generated pages aren't indexed", "doorway pages", "scale content". For one-off content use /content-writer; for keyword discovery use /keyword-research.

nowork-studio/notfair-plugin Claude Code author: nowork-studio MIT 1 file body ≈ 65 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Programmatic SEO planning and audit: building or evaluating large sets of template-generated pages that target long-tail query patterns (e.g. "[service] in…

As a process F 26/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: ../../seo/programmatic-seo/WORKFLOW.md

AnalyzerMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
82/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
54
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
26/100
No process to follow
References files that are not bundled: ../../seo/programmatic-seo/WORKFLOW.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../seo/programmatic-seo/WORKFLOW.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 26/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../seo/programmatic-seo/WORKFLOW.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../../seo/programmatic-seo/WORKFLOW.md
  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 65 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 932: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +4Structure: 1 headings, hard to scan
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -15SKILL.md body under 300 characters: nearly empty
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 12 example trigger phrases

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 54.