SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD release

CONTRIBUTOR TOOL - Cut a plugin release: bump plugin.json version, finalize CHANGELOG, update README if needed, gate on make ci, commit, tag vX.Y.Z, and create the GitHub release. Use when shipping a new plugin version. NOT distributed.

oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix Claude Code author: oliver-kriska 2 files body ≈ 1 663 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 6 h ago

CONTRIBUTOR TOOL - Cut a plugin release: bump plugin.json version, finalize CHANGELOG, update README if needed, gate on make ci, commit, tag vX.Y.Z, and…

As a process D 36/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: scripts/tests/test_codex.py

GeneratorGitHubWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
36/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: scripts/tests/test_codex.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/tests/test_codex.py
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "effort"
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 45): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 36/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/tests/test_codex.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/tests/test_codex.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 24 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 85Steps. 27 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1663 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 236: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.