BD cli-setup-verify
Verify the Omnigent CLI's setup/onboarding flow, terminal UI/UX, and critical user journeys in a completely isolated, reproducible loop. Drives the real `omnigent` binary through a PTY (pexpect) inside a throwaway OMNIGENT_CONFIG_HOME / OMNIGENT_DATA_DIR sandbox that never touches the user's real ~/.omnigent, captures ANSI-stripped frames for UX inspection, and proves a change is verifiable via a before→fix→after baseline diff. Load when developing or reviewing a CLI setup/onboarding/REPL/picker change (omnigent/cli.py, omnigent/onboarding/*, omnigent/repl/*, scripts/install_oss.sh), reproducing a cold-start/first-run UX bug, or confirming a fix actually lands. Several agents can run it concurrently on separate worktrees.
Verify the Omnigent CLI's setup/onboarding flow, terminal UI/UX, and critical user journeys in a completely isolated, reproducible loop.
As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: scripts/install_oss.sh
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
✓ Guard found no suspicious behaviour. 1 matches are attack strings quoted in this security skill's own documentation.
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/install_oss.sh
Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/install_oss.sh
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 20 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2715 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 731: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.