AC run-load-test
Run the Omnigent load test and produce a results file explaining the latencies. Load when the user wants to load-test / stress-test / benchmark Omnigent under concurrency ("load test omnigent", "stress test the server", "how many hosts/sessions/turns can it handle", "load test real agent turns / conversations", "run a load test"). The test makes each simulated user a real omnigent host that creates host-bound sessions and drives real multi-turn conversations with a mocked LLM; it boots its own local stack (dev/loadtest/run.py). Gather inputs, run it, then read the generated summary.md and explain the latency distribution (avg/median/p95/p99, throughput, failures). NOT for single-request latency micro-benchmarks (that is dev/benchmarks/).
Run the Omnigent load test and produce a results file explaining the latencies.
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 4 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 871 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 747: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 4 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.