DD uninstall
Uninstall or hard-clean OpenClaw Companion, Windows node, native Gateway/MXC, WSL Gateway, and managed llama.cpp/Local AI state for a clean retest. Choose the existing dev CLI uninstall or the reviewed hard-clean procedure, inventory exact targets, and obtain destructive confirmation before acting.
Uninstall or hard-clean OpenClaw Companion, Windows node, native Gateway/MXC, WSL Gateway, and managed llama.cpp/Local AI state for a clean retest. Choose the…
As a process D 40/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: scripts/dev-reset-rebuild-launch.ps1
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassHARD-CLEAN.md:16Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassedpowershell.exe -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File .\clea…ps1
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassHARD-CLEAN.md:19Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassedpowershell.exe -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File .\clea…ps1 -ConfirmDestructive
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-persistenceSKILL.md:164Persistence mechanism (cron / launchd / scheduled task / autorun registry) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)# Get-ItemProperty 'HKCU:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run' -Name OpenClawTray-Dev -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassHARD-CLEAN.md:148Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (quoted — discussed, not commanded)Run `powershell.exe -NoProfile -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File
quoted
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/dev-reset-rebuild-launch.ps1
Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/dev-reset-rebuild-launch.ps1
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2417 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 299: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.